THE MEDIA AND POLICE PLAYED GAME WITH NATIONAL INVESTIGATING TEAM TO DRAG MY NAME IN THE MAHABODHI TEMPLE BOMB BLAST
THE FAKE F.I.R FABRICATED AGAINST ME BY THE CULPRITES
THE ABOVE CULPRITS FABRICATED TWO FALSES AGAINST ME
THE ABOVE CULPRITS ARE THE MAIN CULPRITS OF THE WHOLE GAME
Dear Brothers & Sisters my only fault is I took up the Mahabodhi Temple Corruption issue from the year 2007 and I filed a complaint case no. is 850 / 2007 at Gaya District Court for cutting of Holy Bodhi Tree. When the Holy Bodhi Tree Cut Off issue spread all over the world in the year 2006 then the Bureaucrats of State Government Bihar did their best to suppress the news and they were successful but in the year 2007 I am alone singlehandedly proved that in real manner it was cut off in the year 2006 and the Forest Research Institute, Dehradun endorse their finding in this issue at 2007 and then Chief Minister Mr. Nitish Kumar has no option except accepting the truth publicly. The Bureaucrats were determined to teach me a lesson and they started mental torture, no complain of mine ever hard by the district administration till today. I was attacked physically 7 times in between 2005 to 2009 and when I took the path of Law then all administrative people are now hiding under the table. I got a name from the people that ” Lord of the Hell ” LOL. Dear brothers and sisters even after the direction of the National Human Rights Commission of India these bloody corrupt Bureaucrats were deaf and blind only to teach me a lesson. LORD BUDDHA IS WITH ME SO NO ONE CAN DO ANY THING TO ME THAT IS INNER SOUL SAID.
I took up the monetary corruption issue of Mahabodhi Temple with the temple management and government of Bihar then the asses of Bureaucrats started burning like hell. The District Administration of Gaya determined more after defeated in my hand 5 time in the year 2012 in different social issues. I burn the EGO of Bureaucrats ruthlessly to make them understand that they are public servant but not the boss of the public. They can’t digest that a road side Monk Arup Bramhachari can teach them so badly lessons and that is why they are buring like hell LOL. They thinks that we the poor Indians are beggars so we have no rights to talk against them. My 200 letters about Mahabodhi Temple Corruptions and evidence they put into dustbin and to humiliate me they drag my name in the Mahabodhi Temple Bomb Blast. They tied-up with local media persons to dilute my reputation in the society by publishing fake reports which you can see links from article “ About Me ”. I pasted the history of case no. 2309 / 2013 here from where you can know how they tortured me and photos of the culprits. Lord is Lord and HE never do injustice with people. The result is the Supreme Court of India notice the State Government of Bihar and Centre to answer the issue of Case No. 832 / 2013 but all the culprits is running away from court. It will take little time to catch them because of our bloody system but 100% sure that no one will be forgiven.
NOW READ THE WHOLE CASE HISTORY HOW I AM TORTURED !!!!!!
In
The court of Chief Judicial Magistrate
Civil Court, Gaya
Complaint case no. 2309 / 2013
Name of Complainant:
Arup Bramhachari @ Swamiji, Native Address- S/O Late – Birinchi Pada Sarkar, R/O RathTala, TalBagicha, Kharagpur – 6 , District- Paschim Midnapur, West Bengal
Present Address – Root Institute Road, Narsing asthan, P.S -Bodhagaya, District – gaya – 823001
Name & Address of Accused:
1. Balamurgan D. District Magistrate cum Chairman Bodhgaya temple
managing Committee (BTMC), Gaya-823001
2. Ganesh kumar Ex SSP, Gaya, presently on deputation in intelligence
bureau (IB), North Block Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001, through Mr. Syed Asif Ibrahim, Director intelligence bureau (IB) North Block Central Secretariat, New Delhi- 110001
3. Rahul kumar Trainee IAS. Ex-executive officer of Bodhgaya Nagar Panchayat., P.S-Bodhgaya, Gaya, through Principal Home Secretary of Bihar, Old secretariat, Patna, Bihar.
4. Suraj deo kumar , inspector Bodhgaya P.S. Bodhagaya Police station,
P.S- Bodhgaya, District – Gaya – 823001
5. T.N.Tiwary, Officer Incharge, Bodhagaya Police station, P.S – Bodhgaya, District – Gaya 823001
6. Rajesh kumar ASI , Bodhgaya Police station, P.S- Bodhgaya, District – Gaya – 823001
7. Madhusudan Prasad , Ex officer incharge Rampur P.S, District-Gaya – 823001
8. Nanje Dorje,S/o Jigme wanchuk, Gangtok, Sikkim, Secretary, Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee, (BTMC), P.S – Bodhgaya, District – Gaya- 823001
9. Jaglal Mishra,S/o Late Ram Prakash mishra, R/O Bakaraur, Bodhagaya, PRO Bodhgaya Temple management committee, (BTMC), P.S – Bodhgaya, District – Gaya – 823001
10. Gajendra kumar@ Bablu kumar, S/O Gautam Singh, R/o Tika bigha, Bodhagaya, Assistant, Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee, (BTMC), P.S-Bodhgaya, District – Gaya – 823001
11. Jay Prakash singh, S/O Ram vichar singh, R/O balapur, P.S- Badhariya, District-Siwan, Presently posted as ASI at Bodhgaya P.S. District-Gaya
12. Bhante Satyanand, S/O Nathilal, R/O 46/312, Bheem nagar, P.S – Jagdishpura, District-Agra, U.P. Present Address – Shakti sharan agrawal, Lakdi koyele ki dukan, Pachahatti, P.S-Bodhgaya, District – Gaya.
5 – 6 persons unknown
Name of Witnesses:
1. Md. Mumtaz Ahemad, S/O Late Haji Mustaj Ali, R/O Ward – Pachatti,
P.S- Bodhgaya, District- Gaya.
2. Ravindra Kumar, S/O Sri Shiv charan vishwakarma , R/O Madrajbigha
delha, P.S-Delha, District- Gaya.
3. Hasimul Haq. S/O Late Aynul Haq, R/O Ward Bodhgaya Bazer, P.S-
Bodhgaya, District- Gaya.
Place of occurrence:
Bodhgaya police station, Rampur Police station, Office of Bodhgaya
Management Committee (BTMC), Bodhgaya, office of District Magistrate, Gaya. P.S-Bodhgaya, P.S-Rampur, district-Gaya
Date & Time of Occurrence: from 22.05.2013, 13.08.2013 to till date.
Offence committed u/s 166A(B) 328, 344, 352, 211, 193, 192, 200,
217,177,194,304/511, 500 of IPC.
The humble complaint petition on behalf of complainant named above.
Most Respectfully Showeth;
1. That the complainant is a monk not connected with any particular
religion. He is fighting against prevailing corruption in bodhgaya.
2. That in short, before proceeding further it would be prudent to illustrate the changes that took place in the life of complainant.
3. That the moment that changed the life of complainant is reproduced
below in his own word:
I am Arup Bramhachari known as Swami Ji in the society. I am a FAKIR ( a kind of Sufism for understanding my way, for people i am using Sufism ). I was in the forest with my master Munna Warsi for 14 years. We believe God is one, Man is one and All Religions are one. We don’t follow any particular Holy Book or any particular master or any sect, better to say ” ISM “. Our practice is LOVE without showing spiritual power to devotees. We generally don’t accept followers because we want quality and if someone accept any one as a devotee then unbelievable exam we took in many years and that is why we are very few in this world. We don’t build up temple because nature is our Temple and generally we lived in hut or open air. In our tradition we are not allowed to cook, beg, keep money for ourselves and not allowed to contact past family except if there is no one to take care of old mom,father or sick brother, sister.
I came to bodhgaya in the year 2005 to show my last respect to lord Buddha. I was a monk of Bharat Sevasharam Sangha at Gaya. After seeing huge corruption in the organization I decided to come out from the Sangha. I have enough time in hand to catch the train to go to Madras ( South India ) to live rest of my life. When I enter in the Holy Mahabodhi Temple and stood in front of Lord Buddha I started crying like a child. An Old German lady with scratch standing behind me and when she put her hand on my back then I started feeling a NUKE power running in my body. She took me out from Mahabodhi Temple and offered me food. We talked deep rooted aspect of spiritual life throughout night ( 14 hours or so from noon ). She was heavenly lady and every year with a hope I wait for her. She asked me to stay in Bodhgaya to serve Lord Buddha and till today I am here. She was not a normal lady and she told me before leaving, that she will come again at the right time.
4. That after the event that is stated above which proved turning point to the life of complainant and after which he decided to live in bodhgaya where he first encountered with the prevailing corruption causing damage to spiritual atmosphere and converting the pious place to mint money. Condition was very worse. Everyone in bodhgaya is either interested to encash the reputation of bodhgaya or to develop this place as tourist destination.
5. That even the state government and Bodhgaya temple management committee ( for brevity referred as to BTMC ) never kept the sanctity of bodhgaya temple and bodhi tree at their priority. Their prime focusis beautify the temple, attract the foreign tourist and to lure themto donate money flout the norms and conditions to preserve thecenturial temple build by Ashoka and the pious Bodhi tree which istreated and regarded as living tree. They provide special treatment tothe influenced foreigner and dignitaries and violate all mandatory requirement meant for preservation of tree and temple.
6. That the complainant first raised issue of cutting of branches ofpious Bodhi tree for very purpose of smuggling and after herculean efforts succeeded to lodge complaint case bearing no. 850/ 2007. Court took cognizance of the case and it is in trial stage pending in the court of SDJM, Gaya bearing Trial no. 504/2013.
7. That the complainant raised issue of changing structure of spire by adding floating leaf donated by Light of Buddhadhamma Foundation International, Berkley, USA run by family of Dr. Richard Dixey, an American.
8. That the Original spire was made by King Ashoka having archaeological value and a change in that spire is an offence under archeological act.
9. That this act was done by BTMC hence they were apprehensive and in order to restrain the complainant from pursue this issue a false case bearing Bodhgaya P.S. Case no. 119/2013 was instituted by accused no. 10 Bhante Satyanand at the behest of the accused no. 2 to 9.
Photocopy of the F.I.R is annexed as annexure 1
10. That the complainant sought ABP in the said case and he was granted ABP.
11. That the complainant was sick, suffering from typhoid and his health condition was very serious but the time granted in ABP formaking surrender in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate to confirm bail and submit bail bond was one month that was going to be expiredon 16th august 2013 hence on advice of his advocate he surrendered before this court in said case in the light of the order passed in ABP no. 1836 on 13th august 2013. He was enlarged on bail.
12. That the advocate of complainant advised him to obtain surrendercum bail certificate and submit the same to the officer incharge Bodhgaya Police Station. On advice of advocate, complainant reached to the bodhgaya P.S. to submit Surrender cum bail certificate along with one Md. Mumtaz.
13. That the Complainant visited bodhgaya P.S. in the evening of 13th August 2013 at about 6.00 PM to submit surrender cum bail certificate and he was accompanied with one Md. Mumtaz an RTI activist who was bailer also in the case no. 119/2013 and in the presence of Md. Mumtaz incharge of Bodhgaya P.S. Accused no. 4 Mr. T.N. Tiwary detained the accused on the pretext of that he wants to discuss some matter with Complainant. As it was the time of Namaj of Asar ( third prayer ) so Md. Mumtaz told the incharge Mr. T.N Tiwary that it is going to be late for Namaj and he will just come after performing it. When he came back, it was informed that the accused has been forwarded to the Rampur P.S but it was not informed under what circumstances and under which case accused has been forwarded to Rampur P.S.
14. That the accused no.5 officer incharge asked the complainant to sit in his office and thereafter he came out of office and talked to some one on phone. Accused no. 5 informed the complainant to that SSP accused no. 2 wants to see him.
15. That the complainant requested him that his health is not permitting him to move so it would be better if the meeting with SSP accused no. 2 is fix for tomorrow but the officer incharge reluctantly told him that it is important and he has to see the SSP today.
16. That the accused no.5 asked the complainant to board the police vehicle. Two police officers and four constable also boarded in the said vehicles.
17. That the accused no. 4 deliberately selected the longest way toreach Gaya town and while the vehicle was passing through the back of the house of advocate of complainant, he requested the accused no.4 to 6 to let him inform his lawyer but request was turned down.
18. That when the vehicle reached to the residence of SSP and theaccused did not stop there, complainant got suspicious and enquired why you are not stopping here, the accused no. 5 informed him that SSP is sitting at Rampur police station so we are going there.
19. That when police vehicle entered Rampur Police station, complainant again enquired where is the SSP but this time too, accused no. 6 Rajesh kumar told that SSP is conducting raid and he will come soon. Complainant was asked to sit in the office and wait.
20. That the accused no. 4 & 6 stealthily left the Rampur Police station without informing the complainant.
21. That after 10 to 15 minutes, complainant enquired about the accused no. 4 & 6 then he was informed by one police man that they have left and now you sit inside lockup. Complainant protested but was forcefully put up inside lock up which was completely dark, dirty and full of mosquitoes.
22. That the complainant was in severe pain. He requested for medicine. He was repeatedly requesting and was crying for medicine due to unbearable pain and fever.
23. That the complainant was begging for life. He told the accused no. 7 officer incharge Rampur Police station about his health and also informed him that any medical negligence may cost his life but the accused no. 7 threatened him that sit quietly, all these things were not in mind while sending email to the senior officers. They have instructed me to teach you a lesson.
24. That when the health condition of complainant started deteriorating, police men deputed in night informed someone thereafter night patrolling team called a compounder at about 1 AM on 14th august.
25. That the compounder saw the seriousness and was preparing foradminister injection but before that asked from complainant whether hehas taken meal and after getting knowledge that the complainant hasnot taken meal since morning of 13th august, compounder denied toadminister injection giving reason that the injection in empty stomach may dangerous to life.
26. That some medicine was given by compounder but the complainant was not brought out of lock up. No meal was provided.
27. That the complainant was kept inside lock up/Hazat in Rampur P.S.without any F.I.R. He was not even informed about the reason for his arresting and was denied to allow meeting with his advocate.
28. That on 14th august 2013 when the counsel of complainant got information about the detention of the complainant, made call from his mobile no. 8797006594 to the mobile no. 9431822220 of incharge ofRampur P.S. accused no.7 to enquire the matter but the o/c of Rampur shown ignorance about the reason of detention and replied that he does not know in which case complainant has been put up in his P.S. as the complainant has been forwarded by Bodhgaya P.S. so enquire the matter from bodhgaya.
29. That the counsel made a call to bodhgaya incharge on his mobileno. 9431822208, who affirmed detention but did not reveal reason of detention.
30. That at about 10 AM on 14th august counsel made call on mobile no.9431822973 of senior superintendent of Police, Gaya to enquire aboutthe reason for detention and enquired why the person detained has notbeen informed the reason. SSP, replied that some email has been sentto District Magistrate, Gaya that is why complainant has been arrested but he too, did not inform the case number and name of the informant.
31. That the complainant was put up inside lock up of Rampur P.S. andwhen enquiry was made by the counsel of accused from SSP, Gayaregarding case no. at about 10 AM on 14th August, police immediately brought him out from lock up and illegally detained him inside office of Rampur P.S.
32. That the petitioner was brought before court after 4 PM on 14th August and was remanded in judicial custody.
33. That the said case bearing Bodhgaya P.S. Case no. 201/2013 was instituted on the basis of a memo bearing no. 2051/ गो० dated 22.05.2013 Issued by the accused no. 1 District Magistrate, Mr. Balamurugam D and was sent to Bodhgaya police.
34. That the bodhgaya police inquired the matter mentioned in the saidmemo of District Magistrate, and the said F.I.R. was instituted by anASI Jayprakash singh accused no. 11. u/s 186, 384, 501, 506, of IPC & 43, 66 (a) , 67 of IT act.
Photocopy of the F.I.R 201/13 is annexed as annexure 2.
35. That the said F.I.R was instituted at the instruction and in conspiracy hatches by accused no. 1 to 2 and 4 to 11.
36. That the District Magistrate accused no. 1 issued the said memono. 2051 dated 22.05.2013 but did not come forward to institute F.I.Rrather waited for right time to implicate the complainant. The saidmemo was never brought on record either in case diary or at the time of remand of complainant in bodhgaya case no.201/2013.
37. That the accused no. 2 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 conspired andon 13th august 2013, I.O of the case accused no. 4 Suraj deo kumarstarted investigation at about 14.40 ( 2.40 PM) and within the shortspan of 3 hour recorded statement of accused no. 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12but did not record the statement of the accused no. 1 District Magistrate upon whose memo no. 2051 dated 22.05.2013 enquiry in this case was commenced and which was the genesis of the Bodhgaya P.S. Case no. 201/2013. I.O neither visited place of occurrence nor mentioned when and where offence took place.
38. That the complainant was arrested at the eve of 13th august 2013and was produced before this court in the evening of 14th august 2013 but, said diary of Bodhgaya P.S. case no. 201/2013 or any other evidence or documents was not produced by the police as memo of evidence at the time of remand though the case diary produced later inthe court of Additional district & Session judge IV was written only to the date of 14th august 2013, this established that the policewas not having any evidence at the time of remand and the diary was antedated prepared later on for very purpose of giving false evidence for rejection of bail.
39. That the case diary was vital piece of evidence to substantiate the offence alleged to be committed u/s 384 of IPC and 67 of IT act though F.I.R no. 201/2013 of Bodhgaya P.S. was consisting documents of more than 70 pages mostly email, audit report, letter sent by complainant to the higher authorities containing details of corruption prevailing in bodhgaya, photographs, copy of newspapers related to the mismanagement and corruption of Bodhgaya.
40. That the F.I.R of Bodhgaya P.S. case no. 201/2013 was premeditated and all the accused conspired to add the non-bailable section 384 of IPC & 67 of IT act without any material evidence in order to put the complainant behind bar.
41. That the accused no. 2 then SSP, Gaya threaten to the complainant by using word on phone “ Chaliye aapkaa elaz karte hai “ and also instructed accused no. 4 o/c Bodhagaya T.N. Tiwary to teach lesson to the complainant. Officer incharge came to the king press godown beside Ram Guest House, Miya Bigha where complainant in sick condition was lying and seized his lap top as well as mobile on 28.05.2013 the same was handed over to the Rahul kumar Trainee IAS. Ex-executive of Bodhgaya Nagar Panchayat accused no. 3 and accused no. 2. Both made several changes in software of laptop and deleted files.
42. That the complainant made a written complainant to the then SSP explaining all the things but no reply was given by accused no. 2.
Photocopy of the letter sent to accuse no. 2 is annexed as annexure 3.
43. That the accused no.1 Mr. Bala Murugan D intentionally sent accused no.3 Mr. Rahul Kumar the IAS trainee as an executive officer of Bodhgaya Municipality to teach an evil lesson to the complainant for his genuine complain about Mahabodhi Temple corruption to the higher authorities of the government. Their inactiveness against genuine complain of the complainant may cause them punishment under the law. The district administration also have their hidden agenda to displace the goal ghar market complex infront of holy Mahabodhi temple which was the prerequisite demand of World Heritage Site and that demand the district authority did not able to fulfilled due to public protest since long time.
44. That to fulfil the whole hidden agenda of the government the District Magistrate of Gaya accused no.1 Mr. Bala Murugan D throws all the laws of the municipal act of Bihar aside and deliberately appointed accused no.3 IAS Trainee Mr. Rahul Kumar as an executive officer of Bodhgaya Municipality. The complainant came to Bodhgaya Municipality with sickness to inquire about the reply of RTI which was forwarded to Bodhgaya Municipal authority by Gaya District office. The complainant gave introductory slip to accused no.3 IAS trainee Mr.Rahul Kumar and when he entered in the chamber then Mr.Rahul Kumar said “ Tum Hi Bodhgaya Ke Swami Ji Ho ? District Magistrate Ko Tum Gali De Te Ho ? Tumari Har Baat Ki Recording Hum Logo Ki Pas Hai. Tum Chair Pe Kaise Bait Gaya ? Tum Ko Chair Me Bait Ne Ka Permission Kon Diya ? ” The complainant replied to accused no.3 IAS Trainee Mr. Rahul Kumar that “ I am here to enquire the position of his RTI complain ”. Then the accused no.3 IAS Trainee Mr.Rahul Kumar said to the complainant that “ Tum Kavi Peetai Khaya Ho ? ” After humiliation the complainant got up from the chair and said “ I am very much sick so took the seat and after opening the door of the chamber the complainant replied out of anger to accused no.3 IAS Trainee Mr.Rahul Kumar that “ Jis Mai Ka Lal Ki Aukat O Chu Kar Dekh Le Fir High Court ya Supreme Court Se Bari Dhang Se Samjh Dunga ”. Then the complainant informed the Dy.Chaiman of Bodhgaya Municipality about the incident by meeting him physically and also wrote a complain letter to Principal Home Secretary of Bihar. When the complainant asked questions under RTI about the appointment of accused no.3 IAS Trainee Mr. Rahul Kumar then the district authorities is under “Silence” including the Commissioner of Magadh Division even after 1st appeal under RTI.
Annexure 4 – Photocopy of the letter sent to Principal Home Secretary.
45. That the complainant made 4 complains and 3 FIR at Bodhgaya Police Station about illegally changes the Spire ( Chattri ) of the Holy Mahabodhi Temple and monetary mismanagement of the Mahabodhi Temple Management but the Bodhgaya Police Station incharge accused no.5 MR.T.N. Tiwari deliberately keep aside all the complains since 2012 against High Ranking Government Officers of Bihar, The A.S.I Director- Delhi, The accused no. 5, 8, 9, 10 and Dr. Richard Dixey from Light of BuddhaDhamma Foundation International, USA only to save them. Even after repeated written appeal for taking action to then DIG of Magadh Division Mr.Hasnayan Kha, Commissioner of Magadh Division Mr. Vivek Kumar, Gaya District Magistrate Mrs. Bandana Priyashi, Principal Home Secretary of Bihar Mr. Amir Shubhani, DGP of Bihar Mr. Abhayananda, Principal Secretary of Tourism of Bihar and Chief Secretary of Bihar but all goes into vain. The reason behind to destroy the hut of the complainant is to destroy all evidence against above mentioned name so that the complainant must be a layman at Hon’ble Court to prove his grievances. That is the reason why till today Bodhgaya Police station, Present DIG of Magadh & SSP of Gaya did not registered FIR so that the officers can be save from the action of law of the Land.
46. That the accused no.1 & accused no.2 made all arrangement to teach a lesson at Gaya Central Jail. The Complainant did not get proper medical treatment at Gaya Central Jail which can be verified from the medical prescription of the Gaya Central Jail. The Complainant was suffering from the complain of liver problem but the medical sergeant turndown all the request in the jail and the medical sergeant wrote in his assessment that the complainant is totally fit and discharge from the medical ward of the Gaya Central Jail. When Gaya Medical Collage checked the complainant after his stomach pain then the Sr. Sergeant from Gaya Medical Collage was asking the Jail Medical Superintendent that “ Why the Ultra Sound has not been done when the patient is telling the pain is old ” then the Jail Medical Superintendent was silent and the Sr. Sergeant from Gaya Medical Collage asked immediate arrangement for Ultra Sound to cheek the present condition. Even after repeated appeal to the jail authority by the complainant they did not arrange necessary arrangement for doing Ultra Sound examination. And not only that the Medical Superintendent of Jail wrote and personally requested the Jailer to made all arrangement but all request goes into vain. The Complainant got medical treatment of “ Internal Gas Formation ” for 40 Days which damage the liver of the complainant.
47. That the accused no.1 the District Magistrate of Gaya made plan with accused no.5 the Bodhgaya Gaya Police station incharge Mr. T.N.Tiwary to arrange a land mafia to destroy his hut. They choose the time to carry out the work when Arup Bramhachari the complainant was in jail by a fabricated Bodhgaya case 201 / 2013 at Bodhgaya police station on dated 13-08-2013.
48. That the Bodhgaya Police Station incharge accused no.5 Mr. T.N. Tiwari appointed Mr. Mahindar Yadav, S/o late Hari Yadav from Miya Bigha, bodhgaya to carry out the destruction work of Arup Bramhachari’s hut. Mr. Mahinder Yadav brought JCB Machine at mid night to destroy the hut. Even after written complain to SSP of Gaya Mr. Nisant Tiwari on dated 02-10-2013 no FIR has been registered at bodhgaya police station.
49. That the accused persons made criminal conspiracy and that is established from the fact that the witnesses in Bodhgaya.
Arup Bramhachari
Complainant
Madan Kr. Tiwari – 11.12.13
I read and understood the content of this complains.
Arup Bramhachari
swami.ji 
Leave a comment